Lived experience: perceptions of competency of novice teachers (IR)

Goh Pauline Swee Choo, Yusuf Qismullah, Wong Kung Teck,

QR Code Link :
Type :	article
Subject :	L Education (General)
ISSN :	1694-609X
Main Author :	Goh Pauline Swee Choo, Yusuf Qismullah, Wong Kung Teck,
Title :	Lived experience: perceptions of competency of novice teachers (IR)

Year of Publication :	2017
PDF Full Text :	The author has requested the full text of this item to be restricted.

Full Text :

This study bridges the gap of an outsider-insider perspective of competency and captures the essence of what constitutes competency among 18 novice teachers in their own actions performed in real classrooms. In this study, relevant aspects of the novice teachers’ ‘lived-experience’ in their schools make up their conceptions of competency. Novice teachers’ talk about achieving their aims of competency in strategically different ways and in each of these ways, the novice teachers’ strategies are critical to their understanding of the novice teacher-student roles. Five identified conceptions are: controls in the classroom and behaviour of students, methodical preparation, uses of sound in pedagogical knowledge and skills, understanding and empowering their students to take charge of their own learning, and an awareness of themselves as teachers. The conceptions of competency are represented diagrammatically and are discussed with respect to levels of complexity. Variation exists in the way novice teachers conceive of their competency. Teacher educators should be cognizant of the diversity in practices of teachers and not limit that to say that there is just one acceptable conception of competency.

References

1. Admiraal, W., & Berry, A. (2015). “Video narratives to assess student teachers’ competence as new teachers.” Teachers and Teaching. doi:10.1080/13540602.2015.1023026 2. Balli, S.J. (2009). Making a difference in the classroom: Strategies that connect with students. Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield Education. 3. Darling-Hammond, L., Newton, S. P., & Wei, R. C. (2013). “Developing and assessing beginning teacher effectiveness: The potential of performance assessments.” Educational Assessment, Evaluation, and Accountability, 25(3): 179-204. doi:10.1007/s11092-013-9163-0 4. Rahman, F.A., Scaife, J., Yahya, N.A., & Jalil, H.A. (2010). Knowledge of diverse learners: implications for the practice of teaching. International Journal of Instruction, 3(2), 83-96. 5. Fatiha, S., Abd Razak, Z., & Shanina, S.A.S. (2013). “Novice teachers’ challenges and survival: Where do Malaysian ESL teachers stand?” American Journal of Educational Research, 1(4), 119-125. doi: 10.12691/education-1-4-2 6. Feiman-Nemser, S. (2001). “From preparation to practice: Designing a continuum to strengthen and sustain teaching.” Teacher College Record, 103(6), 1013–1055. 7. Goh, P.S.C., and Matthews, B. (2011). “Listening To the concerns of student teachers In Malaysia during teaching practice.” Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 36(3), 92-103. doi: 10.14221/ajte.2011v36n3.2 8. Goh, P.S.C., & Blake, D. (2015). “Teacher preparation in Malaysia: Needed changes.” Teaching in Higher Education, 20(5), 469-480. doi: 10.1080/13562517.2015.1020780 9. Halverson, R. Kelly, C., & Kimball, S. (2004). “How principals make sense of complex artifacts to shape local instructional practice.” In Educational administration, policy, and reform: Research and measurement, edited by W.K. Hoy and C. G. Greenwich, 153-188. CT: George F Johnson. 10. Larsson, J., & Holmstrom, I. (2007). “Phenomenographic or phenomenological analysis: does it matter? Examples from a study on anesthesiologists’ work.” 11. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being, 2(1), 55-64. doi: 10.1080/17482620601068105 12. Malaysia first in region to adopt benchmark for educators. (2009). The Star Online, December 3. http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2009/12/3/nation/5225720&sec=nation 13. Martön, F., and Pong, W.Y. (2005). “On the unit of description in phenomenography.” Higher Education Research and Development, 24(4), 335-348. doi: 10.1080/07294360500284706 14. McCormack, A., Gore, J., & Thomas, K. (2006). “Early career teacher professional learning.” Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 34(1), 95-113. doi: 10.1080.13598660500480282 15. Page, M.L. (2008). You can’t teach until everyone is listening: Six simple steps to preventing disorder, disruption, and general mayhem. California: Corwin Press. 16. Rodman, G. J. (2010). “Facilitating the teaching-learning process through the reflective engagement of pre-service teachers.” Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 35(2), 20-34. 17. Sandberg, J., and Pinnington, A.H. (2009). “Professional competence as ways of being: An existential ontological perspective.” Journal of Management Studies, 46(7), 1138-1170. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00845.x 18. Schön, D.A. (1983). The reflective practitioner. New York: Basic Books. 19. Serafini, F. (2002). “Possibilities and challenges: The national board for professional teaching standards.” Journal of Teacher Education, 53(4), 316-327. doi: 10.1177/0022487102053004004 20. Stokking, K., Leender, F., De Jong, J., & Van Tarwijk, J. (2003). “From student to teacher: Reduce practice shock and early dropout in the teaching profession.” European Journal of Teacher Education, 26(3), 328-350. doi: 10.1080/026197603200012817 21. Sykes, G., Bird T., & Kennedy, M. (2010). “Teacher education: its problems and some prospects.” Journal of Teacher Education, 61(5), 464-476. doi: 10.1177/0022487110375804. 22. Tuinamuana, K. (2011). “Teacher professional standards, accountability, and ideology: Alternative discourses.” Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 36(12), 72-82. 23. Walker, R.J. (2008). “Twelve characteristics of an effective teacher: A longitudinal, qualitative, quasi-research study of in-service and pre-service teachers' opinions.” Educational Horizons, 87(1), 61-68. 24. Walls, R.T., Nardi, A.H., von Minden, A.M., & Hoffman, N. (2002). “The characteristics of effective and ineffective teachers.” Teacher Education Quarterly, 29(1), 39-48. 25. Wolf, K., & Siu-Run yan, Y. (1996). “Portfolio purposes and possibilities.” Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 40(1), 30–37. 26. Wong, A.K.Y., Chan, K.W., & Lai, P.Y. (2009). “Revisiting the relationships of epistemological beliefs and conceptions about teaching and learning of pre-service teachers in Hong Kong.” The Asia-Pacific Educational Researcher, 18(1), 1-19.

This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials.
You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research.

Back to previous page